Department of Homeland Security, and Science and Technology Policy and Essay

Department of Homeland Security, and scientific discipline and engineering science Policy and Politics - Essay ExampleScience is about the search for objective evidence that would withstand successful predictions about the world around us while governing is about governing base on the publics acceptance of the legitimacy and accountability of elected officials. On the other hand, in the U.S. democracy, science and politics are uniquely dependent on one another, although the relationship has never been an easy one. The search for fairness in science and for legitimacy in politics both require systems for generating public trust, but these systems are not the same, and indeed they are often incompatible. (Branscomb, Oct. 14, 2006) The aim for both to be acceptable in the rescript entails great deal of issues that are needed to be resolved to attain the same goal of achieving potentiality and concord for the community.The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security ha s created several issues about its yet another governmental dogma that might so fartually become another burden of the federal government that will be the US community.Although science and technology has an unlimited capacity in preserving peace and stability of a nation, the need for a government and public support is an integral part in its ut about success. Even the nearly basic explore requires financial assistance from the government such that it may be able to go forth an incomparable assistance to the society. This irrefutable fact, on the other hand, provides restrictions in its competence of granting both practical and cultural value to society. (Branscomb, Oct. 14, 2006)Moreover, yet other factors that concerns public policy affect the various accomplishments that may have been achieve by science and technology. Foreign policies that promote or limit collaborations of scientists worldwide may prevent wise and innovative ideas to launch. The educational system that may train and develop the raw breed of scientists in the afterlife provides a very limited if not anything at all. The achievement of these goals of science and technology depends on new scientific institutions and facilities that would define the leading-edge capabilities of science. Finally, scientists, like other citizens, do care about how society uses the knowledge their research creates. In addition, for this reason, a great number of citizens are happy to serve on advisory committees even without financial compensation. (Branscomb, Oct. 14, 2006)Scientists have often opposed the government although they have been accepting federal funding. The federal government perceives them as insufficiently grateful of their assistance for which these scientists overly contesting the government policies. Regardless of the situation, the government could not snub the fact that science and technology and the people behind its research and implementation are a substantial factor in attai ning the nations goals. Politicians still rely on the competent, objective, and useful science advices of the scientists such that in most cases, they are incapable of instigating the different functions of the government agencies that requires sound technical advices. (Branscomb, Oct. 14, 2006)The Department of Homeland Security and Science and Technology Policy And Politics in the USSafeguarding the nation has turned out to be the chief(prenominal) concern of the US federal